Wednesday, August 5, 2009

I think Vanessa Hudgens "leaked" (eww) her latest set of crappy nudie phone pictures. NSFW at ALL.

Oh, Vanessa.

via Dlisted (whom I LOVE!!!)

Heavy sigh. Here I am, writing about one of the "Disney Dorks", who are ALWAYS up to the no good. This little hussy, Vanessa Hudgens had nakey, nakey, eggs and bakey photos on the Intranets about 18 months ago. Or so I heard. Or saw. I didn't talk about it then, but I will now--begrudgingly.

Listen UP. I think she's auditioning. We all know that this little snip wants to be Kate Winslet showing her boobies all over the screen, right? She even recently said she'd go nude in a movie...she's just itching to dump her Disney image (I know, "image? What image might that be??").

Oh. How coincidental she's on Jimmy Kimmel tonight, ya'll. Come ON.

Anyway, these photos are obviously Not Safe For Work (NSFW). CLICK HERE to see something we really shouldn't be seeing, if you're so inclined.

Full. Body. Eyeroll.

2 comments:

Madd Hadder said...

Seriously, i think this girl hates clothing like i hated furbies in the 6th grade.

I mean honestly, this woman needs to stop taking naked pictures of herself! or at least if she is going to force us to look at her oddly shaped breatiscals she should at least have the decency to put them on the big screen and get paid for it. i'm just sayin'

Stuart said...

1) Agree totally, seeing she's got a moving coming out right now.

2) Didn't see sign up to play a stripper in Sucker Punch, which seems to be the Zack Snider "How many actresses can I got topless" movie? I say she already auditioned a couple times now.

3) Disney should have dropped her like a hot rock when they had the chance, but HSM made too much money to ignore. When 3 disappointed everyone, I think it sent a reality check. Though we still have the little HSM show at the parks a.k.a. Stuart's melodic icepick to the brain.

4) All the pull down letters stated that she was a minor when the photos were taken, so technically they're all child pornography. So, whomever leaked them could be sited for distribution of child pornography. That would be...interesting.